DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Rover 75 vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo V50
RoverMakeVolvo
75ModelV50
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo V50
10,3 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
131 HPPower136 HP
300 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo V50
DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo V50
4747 mmLength4522 mm
1778 mmWidth1845 mm
1424 mmHeight1457 mm
1510 KgWeight1472 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Rover 75 and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…