DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Rover 75 vs 2004 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZR
RoverMakeMG
75ModelZR
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZR
10,3 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
193 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
131 HPPower113 HP
300 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZR
DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZR
4747 mmLength4011 mm
1778 mmWidth1690 mm
1424 mmHeight1400 mm
1510 KgWeight1155 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Rover 75 and 2004 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…