E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 75 vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
RoverMakeMG
75ModelZS
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
10,3 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
193 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
131 HPPower113 HP
300 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
4747 mmLength4520 mm
1778 mmWidth1700 mm
1424 mmHeight1390 mm
1510 KgWeight1225 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 75 and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2002 Mercedes-Benz VaneoVS2002 Rover 75Mercedes-Benz Vaneo vs Rover 752002 and 2002 model years2002 BMW Z3VS2002 Rover 75BMW Z3 vs Rover 752002 and 2002 model years2002 Alfa Romeo 147VS2002 Rover 75Alfa Romeo 147 vs Rover 752002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVS2002 Rover 75MG ZR vs Rover 752002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVS2002 Rover 75MG ZS vs Rover 752002 and 2002 model years

Comments are loading…