2002 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.0 CDTi (131 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
2002 Rover 75 vs 2012 Maybach 62 S Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Maybach
62 S
Maybach 62 S 6.0 V12 (621 Hp) 2012Overall Score90.5/100
WINNER
Maybach 62 S
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 31 points.
59.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationMaybach 62 S
RoverMakeMaybach
75Model62 S
2002Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationMaybach 62 S
10,3 s0–100 km/h5,1 s
193 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement5980 cc
131 HPPower621 HP
300 NmTorque1000 Nm
4Cylinders12
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationMaybach 62 S
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank110 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption15,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationMaybach 62 S
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size275/45 R20
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationMaybach 62 S
4747 mmLength6171 mm
1778 mmWidth1980 mm
1424 mmHeight1573 mm
1510 KgWeight2855 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase3827 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Rover 75 and 2012 Maybach 62 S approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Maybach 62 S leads the E-Kıyasla score by 31 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…