DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 75 vs 2016 Fiat Egea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Egea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points.

59.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationFiat Egea
RoverMakeFiat
75ModelEgea
2002Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationFiat Egea
10,3 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
193 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
131 HPPower95 HP
300 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationFiat Egea
DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationFiat Egea
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
195/65 R15Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationFiat Egea
4747 mmLength4532 mm
1778 mmWidth1792 mm
1424 mmHeight1497 mm
1510 KgWeight1205 kg
—Luggage capacity520 lt
2746 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Rover 75

No additional feature records are available.

Fiat EgeaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 75 and 2016 Fiat Egea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Egea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…