DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Rover 75 vs 2005 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
RoverMakeSaab
75Model9-3
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
11,7 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1797 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
260 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
4747 mmLength4635 mm
1778 mmWidth1762 mm
1424 mmHeight1466 mm
1485 KgWeight1380 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Rover 75 and 2005 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…