DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Rover 75 vs 2005 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationBMW X3
RoverMakeBMW
75ModelX3
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationBMW X3
9,1 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
210 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
215 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationBMW X3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank67 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationBMW X3
4747 mmLength4569 mm
1778 mmWidth1853 mm
1424 mmHeight1674 mm
1420 KgWeight1660 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Rover 75 and 2005 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…