2002 • Rover
75
Rover 75 1.8 (120 Hp) 2002Overall Score54.25/100
2002 Rover 75 vs 2002 Honda Sm-x Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Honda
Sm-x
Honda Sm-x 2.0 i 16V (131 Hp) 2002Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationHonda Sm-x
RoverMakeHonda
75ModelSm-x
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationHonda Sm-x
11,6 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
120 HPPower131 HP
160 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/55 R16 93 WTyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationHonda Sm-x
4747 mmLength3950 mm
1778 mmWidth1695 mm
1424 mmHeight1750 mm
1445 KgWeight1330 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Rover 75 and 2002 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…