DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Rover 600 vs 1998 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 600

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeRenault
600ModelMegane
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
195 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1850 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
115 HPPower98 HP
158 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 HTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4645 mmLength4129 mm
1715 mmWidth1699 mm
1380 mmHeight1420 mm
1330 KgWeight1115 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Rover 600 and 1998 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 600 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…