DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Rover 45 vs 2001 Tofas Tempra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeTofas
45ModelTempra
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
185 NmTorque159 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R16 VTyre size185/60 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4517 mmLength4472 mm
1696 mmWidth1695 mm
1394 mmHeight1500 mm
1340 KgWeight1075 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Rover 45 and 2001 Tofas Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…