DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 45 vs 2002 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeCitroen
45ModelXsara
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
190 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
109 HPPower101 HP
138 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank54 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R14 HTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4517 mmLength4167 mm
1696 mmWidth1698 mm
1394 mmHeight1405 mm
1180 KgWeight1070 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 45 and 2002 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…