DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 400 vs 2000 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationRover 45
RoverMakeRover
400Model45
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationRover 45
11,8 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
185 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
103 HPPower103 HP
127 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationRover 45
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationRover 45
4490 mmLength4517 mm
1695 mmWidth1696 mm
1390 mmHeight1395 mm
1120 KgWeight1180 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 400 and 2000 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…