DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Rover 400 vs 1998 Chevrolet Corsa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeChevrolet
400ModelCorsa
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
185 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
103 HPPower92 HP
127 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank46 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength3730 mm
1695 mmWidth1610 mm
1390 mmHeight1390 mm
1120 KgWeight975 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2445 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Rover 400 and 1998 Chevrolet Corsa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…