DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Rover 400 vs 1997 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeCitroen
400ModelXsara
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
185 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
103 HPPower101 HP
127 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4167 mm
1695 mmWidth1698 mm
1390 mmHeight1405 mm
1120 KgWeight1070 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Rover 400 and 1997 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…