DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Rover 400 vs 1995 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationMazda 323
RoverMakeMazda
400Model323
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationMazda 323
11,8 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
185 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
103 HPPower82 HP
127 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationMazda 323
4490 mmLength4340 mm
1695 mmWidth1710 mm
1390 mmHeight1420 mm
1120 KgWeight1170 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Rover 400 and 1995 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…