DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Rover 400 vs 1993 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeFord
400ModelMondeo
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
180 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
103 HPPower88 HP
127 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4370 mmLength4481 mm
1680 mmWidth1749 mm
1400 mmHeight1424 mm
1075 KgWeight1325 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Rover 400 and 1993 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…