DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Rover 400 vs 1997 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points.

53.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationRover 400
RoverMakeRover
400Model400
1997Model year1997
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationRover 400
10,0 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
112 HPPower136 HP
138 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
10 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 HTyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationRover 400
4365 mmLength4365 mm
1680 mmWidth1680 mm
1390 mmHeight1390 mm
1125 KgWeight1210 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Rover 400 and 1997 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…