DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Rover 400 vs 1995 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeSeat
400ModelToledo
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
190 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
112 HPPower90 HP
138 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
10 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 HTyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4365 mmLength4321 mm
1680 mmWidth1662 mm
1390 mmHeight1421 mm
1125 KgWeight1080 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Rover 400 and 1995 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…