DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Rover 25 vs 2004 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 6
RoverMakeMazda
25Model6
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 6
9,1 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
185 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower121 HP
260 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 6
3990 mmLength4700 mm
1688 mmWidth1780 mm
1419 mmHeight1480 mm
1130 KgWeight1465 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Rover 25 and 2004 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…