DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Subaru Legacy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeSubaru
25ModelLegacy
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
113 HPPower125 HP
260 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/70 R14; 195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3990 mmLength4685 mm
1688 mmWidth1745 mm
1419 mmHeight1415 mm
1130 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Subaru Legacy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…