DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Saab 9-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-5
RoverMakeSaab
25Model9-5
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-5
9,1 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2172 cc
113 HPPower120 HP
260 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-5
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-5
3990 mmLength4810 mm
1688 mmWidth1790 mm
1419 mmHeight1450 mm
1130 KgWeight1600 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Saab 9-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…