2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.2 DTI (120 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationOpel Omega
RoverMakeOpel
25ModelOmega
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationOpel Omega
9,1 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
185 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
113 HPPower120 HP
260 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationOpel Omega
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationOpel Omega
3990 mmLength4898 mm
1688 mmWidth1776 mm
1419 mmHeight1455 mm
1130 KgWeight1670 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…