2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Chrysler
PT Cruiser
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2.2 CRD (121 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler PT Cruiser
RoverMakeChrysler
25ModelPT Cruiser
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler PT Cruiser
9,1 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
185 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2148 cc
113 HPPower121 HP
260 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler PT Cruiser
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank57 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler PT Cruiser
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler PT Cruiser
3990 mmLength4290 mm
1688 mmWidth1705 mm
1419 mmHeight1600 mm
1130 KgWeight1540 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…