2002 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2002Overall Score60.25/100
2002 Rover 25 vs 2002 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 2.0 16V (135 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
RoverMakeRenault
25ModelMegane
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
9,1 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower135 HP
260 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
3990 mmLength4209 mm
1688 mmWidth1777 mm
1419 mmHeight1458 mm
1130 KgWeight1240 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Rover 25 and 2002 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…