2004 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (101 Hp) 2004Overall Score60.25/100
2004 Rover 25 vs 2004 Great Wall Safe Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Great Wall
Safe
Great Wall Safe 2.2i (105 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall Safe
RoverMakeGreat Wall
25ModelSafe
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall Safe
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
101 HPPower105 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall Safe
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall Safe
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall Safe
3990 mmLength4860 mm
1688 mmWidth—
1419 mmHeight1820 mm
1130 KgWeight1640 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Rover 25 and 2004 Great Wall Safe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…