DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 25 vs 2002 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationBMW Z3
RoverMakeBMW
25ModelZ3
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationBMW Z3
7,8 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
200 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
145 HPPower118 HP
174 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationBMW Z3
3990 mmLength4050 mm
1688 mmWidth1740 mm
1417 mmHeight1288 mm
1090 KgWeight1220 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 25 and 2002 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…