DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Rover 25 vs 2005 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
RoverMakeSaab
25Model9-3
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1797 cc
117 HPPower122 HP
160 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/55 R15 HTyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
3990 mmLength4635 mm
1688 mmWidth1762 mm
1419 mmHeight1466 mm
1135 KgWeight1380 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Rover 25 and 2005 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…