DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2006 Brilliance M2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeBrilliance
156ModelM2
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1793 cc
150 HPPower170 HP
305 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank74 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption14,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4441 mmLength4648 mm
1743 mmWidth1800 mm
1458 mmHeight1450 mm
1510 KgWeight1455 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2006 Brilliance M2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…