DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Rover 25 vs 2001 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeMazda
25ModelCapella
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
117 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
185/55 R15 HTyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3990 mmLength4575 mm
1688 mmWidth1695 mm
1419 mmHeight1440 mm
1135 KgWeight1210 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Rover 25 and 2001 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…