DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Rover 25 vs 2001 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationFord Mondeo
RoverMakeFord
25ModelMondeo
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationFord Mondeo
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
185 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
117 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/55 R15 HTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationFord Mondeo
3990 mmLength4731 mm
1688 mmWidth1812 mm
1419 mmHeight1429 mm
1135 KgWeight1373 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Rover 25 and 2001 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…