DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Rover 25 vs 2005 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
RoverMakeCitroen
25ModelC3
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
9,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower90 HP
138 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size175/65 R14; 185/60 R15; 195/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
3990 mmLength3860 mm
1688 mmWidth1667 mm
1417 mmHeight1510 mm
1105 KgWeight1088 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Rover 25 and 2005 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…