DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 25 vs 2002 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationFord Fusion
RoverMakeFord
25ModelFusion
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationFord Fusion
9,5 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
180 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower90 HP
138 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationFord Fusion
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationFord Fusion
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationFord Fusion
3990 mmLength4020 mm
1688 mmWidth1708 mm
1417 mmHeight1503 mm
1105 KgWeight1105 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2488 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 25 and 2002 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…