DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeCitroen
25ModelXsara
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
175 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
84 HPPower68 HP
110 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3990 mmLength4167 mm
1688 mmWidth1698 mm
1417 mmHeight1405 mm
1085 KgWeight1120 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…