2004 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
2004 Rover 25 vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2004Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
RoverMakeMitsubishi
25ModelLancer
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
10,2 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
180 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
103 HPPower98 HP
123 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
3990 mmLength4485 mm
1688 mmWidth1695 mm
1417 mmHeight1480 mm
1105 KgWeight1360 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Rover 25 and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…