DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 25 vs 2002 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeRenault
25ModelKangoo
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
180 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
103 HPPower82 HP
123 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3990 mmLength3995 mm
1688 mmWidth1663 mm
1417 mmHeight1827 mm
1105 KgWeight1170 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 25 and 2002 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…