2002 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2002Overall Score51.25/100
2002 Rover 25 vs 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Mitsubishi
Space Star
Mitsubishi Space Star 1.6 (98 Hp) 2002Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
RoverMakeMitsubishi
25ModelSpace Star
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
10,2 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
103 HPPower98 HP
123 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
3990 mmLength4030 mm
1688 mmWidth1715 mm
1417 mmHeight1515 mm
1105 KgWeight1235 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Rover 25 and 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…