DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Rover 200 vs 1986 Lada 2107 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lada 2107

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 200SpecificationLada 2107
RoverMakeLada
200Model2107
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 200SpecificationLada 2107
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
170 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1300 ccEngine displacement1308 cc
75 HPPower138 HP
0 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 200SpecificationLada 2107
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank39 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 200SpecificationLada 2107
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13

Dimensions

Rover 200SpecificationLada 2107
—Length4145 mm
—Width1620 mm
—Height1440 mm
—Weight1040 Kg
—Wheelbase2424 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Rover 200 and 1986 Lada 2107 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lada 2107 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…