1986 • Rover
200
Rover 200 1986Overall Score55.25/100
1986 Rover 200 vs 1986 Acura Integra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1986 • Acura
Integra
Acura Integra 1.6 (115 Hp) 1986Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Acura Integra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
55.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 200SpecificationAcura Integra
RoverMakeAcura
200ModelIntegra
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Rover 200SpecificationAcura Integra
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1300 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
75 HPPower115 HP
0 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 200SpecificationAcura Integra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 200SpecificationAcura Integra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R14
Dimensions
Rover 200SpecificationAcura Integra
—Length4280 mm
—Width1665 mm
—Height1345 mm
—Weight1069 Kg
—Wheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1986 Rover 200 and 1986 Acura Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Acura Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…