1998 • Rover
100
Rover 100 1998Overall Score46.25/100
1998 Rover 100 vs 2000 Seat Arosa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.2 TDI 3L (61 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Seat Arosa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 100SpecificationSeat Arosa
RoverMakeSeat
100ModelArosa
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3
Performance
Rover 100SpecificationSeat Arosa
14,8 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
155 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1119 ccEngine displacement1191 cc
60 HPPower61 HP
90 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 100SpecificationSeat Arosa
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
35 ltFuel tank34 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption3,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption2,7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 100SpecificationSeat Arosa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size155/65R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 100SpecificationSeat Arosa
3521 mmLength3529 mm
1550 mmWidth1621 mm
1377 mmHeight1455 mm
840 KgWeight860 Kg
2269 mmWheelbase2319 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Rover 100 and 2000 Seat Arosa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…