1998 • Rover
100
Rover 100 1998Overall Score46.25/100
1998 Rover 100 vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.1 (B/C/SB0A,B/CB0F) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 100SpecificationRenault Clio
RoverMakeRenault
100ModelClio
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Rover 100SpecificationRenault Clio
14,8 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
155 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1119 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
60 HPPower58 HP
90 NmTorque93 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 100SpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 100SpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 100SpecificationRenault Clio
3521 mmLength3773 mm
1550 mmWidth1640 mm
1377 mmHeight1417 mm
840 KgWeight880 Kg
2269 mmWheelbase2475 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Rover 100 and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…