1998 • Rover
100
Rover 100 1998Overall Score46.25/100
1998 Rover 100 vs 2000 Citroen Saxo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.1 X,SX (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Citroen Saxo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 100SpecificationCitroen Saxo
RoverMakeCitroen
100ModelSaxo
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Rover 100SpecificationCitroen Saxo
14,8 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
155 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1119 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
90 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 100SpecificationCitroen Saxo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 100SpecificationCitroen Saxo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 100SpecificationCitroen Saxo
3521 mmLength3718 mm
1550 mmWidth1595 mm
1377 mmHeight1390 mm
840 KgWeight780 Kg
2269 mmWheelbase2385 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Rover 100 and 2000 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…