DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rolls-Royce Park Ward

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.75–82.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rolls-RoyceMakeRolls-Royce
Park WardModelSilver Seraph
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
225 km/hTop speed225 km/h
5379 ccEngine displacement5379 cc
326 HPPower326 HP
490 NmTorque490 Nm
12Cylinders12

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank94 lt
25,4 ltUrban consumption25,4 lt
12,8 ltExtra-urban consumption12,8 lt
17,4 ltAverage consumption17,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/65 R16 WTyre size235/65 R16 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5640 mmLength5390 mm
1930 mmWidth1932 mm
1515 mmHeight1515 mm
2435 KgWeight2400 Kg
3366 mmWheelbase3116 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward and 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rolls-Royce Park Ward leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…