DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
156ModelS80
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
305 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4441 mmLength4820 mm
1743 mmWidth1830 mm
1458 mmHeight1440 mm
1510 KgWeight1500 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…