DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Toyota Verossa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Verossa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeToyota
156ModelVerossa
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
150 HPPower160 HP
305 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/50 R17Tyre size205/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4441 mmLength4705 mm
1743 mmWidth1760 mm
1458 mmHeight1450 mm
1510 KgWeight1380 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Toyota Verossa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Verossa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…