DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Renault Trafic vs 2011 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeGreat Wall
TraficModelCowry
2011Model year2011
MinivanBody typeMinivan
9Seats8
4Doors4

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2464 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
145 HPPower143 HP
320 NmTorque185 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,7 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4574 mm
1904 mmWidth1704 mm
1955 mmHeight1845 mm
1710 KgWeight1510 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Renault Trafic and 2011 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…