DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Trafic vs 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMitsubishi
TraficModelOutlander
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeSUV
9Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
173 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2464 ccEngine displacement2360 cc
145 HPPower170 HP
320 NmTorque232 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4640 mm
1904 mmWidth1800 mm
1955 mmHeight1720 mm
1710 KgWeight1665 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Trafic and 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…