DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Trafic vs 2003 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.5–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeLand Rover
TraficModelDiscovery
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
9Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
163 km/hTop speed157 km/h
2463 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
135 HPPower136 HP
310 NmTorque300 Nm
—Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
90 ltFuel tank95 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4710 mm
1904 mmWidth1860 mm
1940 mmHeight1890 mm
1935 KgWeight2020 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Trafic and 2003 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…