DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Renault Trafic vs 2010 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
TraficModelBravo
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeHatchback
9Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
140 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
240 NmTorque290 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
90 ltFuel tank57 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4336 mm
1904 mmWidth1792 mm
1955 mmHeight1498 mm
1650 KgWeight1320 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Renault Trafic and 2010 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…