DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Renault Trafic vs 2006 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSaab
TraficModel9-3
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeSedan
9Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
155 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1797 cc
100 HPPower122 HP
240 NmTorque167 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4635 mm
1904 mmWidth1762 mm
1940 mmHeight1466 mm
1791 KgWeight1380 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Renault Trafic and 2006 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…