DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Trafic vs 2016 Qoros 5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Qoros 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeQoros
TraficModel5
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSUV
9Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
177 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
145 HPPower156 HP
340 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4600 mm
1956 mmWidth1869 mm
1971 mmHeight1676 mm
1807 KgWeight1540 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Trafic and 2016 Qoros 5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Qoros 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…